Skip to main content
English version. Prefer Traditional Chinese? Switch to Chinese
Patient education · AD / Systemic Per AAD 2024 + 2023 + UpToDate 2024 Content updated 2026-10-16 · Physician reviewed 2026-05-09

Systemic therapy for atopic dermatitis
Biologics, JAK inhibitors, phototherapy compared

TL;DR:Systemic therapy comes after topical treatment fails to control the disease. Phototherapy is a reasonable alternative or bridge; biologics and JAK inhibitors differ in onset, administration and monitoring, and with Taiwan's reimbursement criteria the choice depends on severity and access.

When AD remains moderate-severe (EASI ≥ 16, IGA ≥ 3) or significantly impacts sleep/work after 4-8 weeks of adequate topical care, step up to systemic therapy. AAD 2024 update (Davis): (1) Biologics — dupilumab/Dupixent® (extensive long-term safety data), tralokinumab, lebrikizumab, nemolizumab (marked itch reduction in trials); (2) Oral JAK inhibitors — abrocitinib, upadacitinib (rapid onset, high clearance rates in trials, but FDA black-box warning); (3) NB-UVB phototherapy (alternative when biologics/JAKi unavailable). This article includes a detailed comparison chart.

In this article
  1. When to step up to systemic therapy
  2. Phototherapy
  3. Biologics (subcutaneous, extensive safety data)
  4. JAK inhibitors (oral, rapid onset, FDA black-box)
  5. Traditional immunosuppressants
  6. Decision framework
  7. Bottom line
Key Fact (Davis 2024, JAAD update · Davis 2024, JAAD photo+systemic)

Dupilumab launched the AD precision-medicine era in 2017. Before that, moderate-to-severe AD could only rely on cyclosporine (short-term) or struggle with topicals. Today 4 biologics + 3 JAK inhibitors achieve EASI 75 in 60–78% without routine blood monitoring. Taiwan NHI conditionally covers dupilumab, upadacitinib, abrocitinib and (from 2026/6/1) lebrikizumab for patients ≥ 12 years with EASI ≥ 16, inflamed BSA ≥ 30%, IGA 3–4 and prior phototherapy/systemic-treatment failure, after pre-authorization. Tralokinumab and nemolizumab are not NHI-covered for AD.

When to step up to systemic therapy

EASI ≥ 16 or IGA ≥ 3, BSA ≥ 10% with ≥ 3 nights/week sleep disturbance, DLQI ≥ 11 or POEM ≥ 17, or 4-8 weeks of adequate topical care without control.

Phototherapy

NB-UVB (311 nm) 2-3×/week × 12-24 weeks; EASI 50 ~ 50-60%. Pregnancy-safe. UVA1 for acute exudative AD (limited Taiwan availability). PUVA largely retired.

Biologics (subcutaneous, extensive safety data)

  • Dupilumab (anti-IL-4Rα): every 2 weeks SC, EASI 75 ~51%, ≥ 6 months age, FDA 2017, conjunctivitis 8-15%. Taiwan NHI-covered with criteria (age ≥ 12: EASI ≥ 16, inflamed BSA ≥ 30%, IGA 3–4, prior failures; separate criteria for ages 6 to under 12).
  • Tralokinumab (anti-IL-13): every 2 weeks SC, EASI 75 ~33%, ≥ 12 y.
  • Lebrikizumab (anti-IL-13, newer): every 4 weeks SC maintenance, EASI 75 ~53%, FDA 2024 ≥ 12 y. Taiwan NHI-covered with criteria from 2026/6/1 (≥ 12 y and ≥ 40 kg).
  • Nemolizumab (anti-IL-31R): every 4 weeks SC, itch reduction ~70%, EASI 75 ~36%, FDA 2024 ≥ 12 y.

JAK inhibitors (oral, rapid onset, FDA black-box)

  • Upadacitinib (JAK1) 15-30 mg/day, EASI 75 up to 78%, ≥ 12 y. Onset 1-2 weeks. Taiwan NHI-covered with criteria.
  • Abrocitinib (JAK1) 100-200 mg/day, EASI 75 ~60-73%, ≥ 12 y. Taiwan NHI-covered with criteria.
  • Baricitinib (JAK1/2): EU and Japan approved for AD; not FDA-approved for AD. EASI 75 ~25-30%.

Black-box: MACE, VTE, lymphoma, serious infections. Avoid age ≥ 65, smokers, prior CV/VTE/malignancy.

Traditional immunosuppressants

Cyclosporine 2.5-5 mg/kg/day (≤ 1 year, fast acting); methotrexate 10-25 mg/week; azathioprine 1-3 mg/kg/day (check TPMT); mycophenolate 2-3 g/day. Systemic steroids only as short-term bridge.

Decision framework

Higher clearance and oral preference → upadacitinib 30 mg. Long-term safety priority, no labs → dupilumab. Itch-dominant → nemolizumab. Failed dupilumab → lebrikizumab. Cannot use biologic/JAKi → NB-UVB + cyclosporine bridge.

Bottom line

Modern AD treatment offers 4 biologics + 3 JAKi reaching EASI 75 in 33-78% of patients. Dupilumab has extensive long-term safety data; upadacitinib offers rapid onset and high clearance rates in trials, with a black-box trade-off; nemolizumab uniquely targets itch. Discuss with your dermatologist based on goals, safety profile, convenience, and cost.