Skip to main content
English version. Prefer Traditional Chinese? Switch to Chinese
Patient guide · Interactive tools

Dermatology severity scales
a complete guide

Clinical scoring tools are how dermatologists quantify severity objectively, track response to treatment, and judge eligibility for NHI-funded biologics. This guide covers the intended patient, method, how to read the score, the treatment strategy it points to, the limitations and the original citation for the ten scales used most, so you can understand your own disease and discuss it precisely with your doctor.

Important: every scale here is a patient self-assessment aid and does not replace a face-to-face specialist assessment. NHI biologic applications and prescribing decisions must be made by a dermatologist on the full history and examination. This site carries no advertising and no sponsorship; every society consensus cited can be checked on PubMed.

01SCORAD — Severity Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis

Score 0-103Atopic dermatitisStalder JF, 1993

Who it is for

  • Atopic dermatitis (AD) at any age: infants, children and adults alike
  • Tracking response before and after treatment (baseline / 4 weeks / 12 weeks)
  • A reference point when applying for biologics such as dupilumab, JAK inhibitors, tralokinumab or lebrikizumab

Method — three components

SCORAD = A/5 + 7B/2 + C
  1. A · Affected area (0-100%), estimated by the rule of nines
    • Head and neck 9% / each upper limb 9% (18% both) / front of trunk 18% / back of trunk 18% / each lower limb 18% (36% both) / perineum 1%
    • Infants differ: head 18%, each lower limb 13.5%
  2. B · Six objective signs, total 0-18 (each 0-3)
    • Erythema, oedema/papulation, oozing/crust, excoriation, lichenification, dryness (assessed on unaffected skin)
    • 0 = none / 1 = mild / 2 = moderate / 3 = severe
  3. C · Subjective symptoms, total 0-20
    • Pruritus 0-10 + sleep loss 0-10
    • The average over the past 3 days, rated by the patient

How to read the score

ScoreSeverityTreatment strategy it points to
< 25MildTopical corticosteroid + emollient + tacrolimus / pimecrolimus
25-50Moderate+ NB-UVB phototherapy, proactive therapy (weekend maintenance application)
> 50Severe+ Dupilumab / JAK inhibitor / ciclosporin (short course)

What the result means, and what to do next

  • SCORAD ≥ 50 is one of the reference thresholds for a Taiwan NHI dupilumab application (alongside EASI, DLQI and failure of topical therapy)
  • Response: SCORAD-50 = a fall of ≥ 50% after treatment (clinically meaningful); SCORAD-75 = a good response
  • Follow-up: moderate-to-severe disease should be reassessed every 4-12 weeks
  • For infants, adjust per the Werfel 2024 S3 paediatric version — the area proportions differ

Limitations and cautions

Limitations: (1) the objective signs (B) need a dermatologist's assessment and are hard for a patient to rate accurately; (2) it is sensitive to fluctuation over the past 3 days; (3) it does not capture the functional impact of hand or genital involvement (use EASI or POEM instead); (4) erythema is easily overcalled in a crying infant.

Original citation

Stalder JF, et al. Severity scoring of atopic dermatitis: the SCORAD index. Dermatology. 1993;186(1):23-31. PMID 8435513
Werfel T, et al. S3 Guideline Atopic Dermatitis Part 1+2. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2024. PMID 38171719
Open the SCORAD calculator →

02PASI — Psoriasis Area and Severity Index

Score 0-72PsoriasisFredriksson, 1978

Who it is for

  • Severity assessment for plaque psoriasis
  • Taiwan NHI biologic threshold: PASI ≥ 10 + BSA ≥ 10% + DLQI ≥ 10, plus failure of two conventional therapies (methotrexate / phototherapy / acitretin)
  • Not for: pustular, erythrodermic, guttate or scalp psoriasis (use PSSI for scalp)

Method

PASI = 0.1×(Eh+Ih+Dh)×Ah + 0.2×(Ea+Ia+Da)×Aa + 0.3×(Et+It+Dt)×At + 0.4×(El+Il+Dl)×Al
h = head and neck / a = upper limbs / t = trunk / l = lower limbs
  1. Four body regions, weighted: head and neck ×0.1, upper limbs ×0.2, trunk ×0.3, lower limbs ×0.4 (summing to 1.0)
  2. Three signs per region (0-4):
    • E · erythema: none / light red / red / dark red / deep red
    • I · induration (thickness): none / slight / moderate / thick / very thick
    • D · desquamation: none / fine / coarse / thick / adherent
  3. Area grade (0-6): 0 = 0%, 1 = <10%, 2 = 10-29%, 3 = 30-49%, 4 = 50-69%, 5 = 70-89%, 6 = 90-100%

How to read the score

ScoreSeverityTreatment strategy it points to
< 5MildTopical calcipotriol / calcipotriol-betamethasone / corticosteroid
5-10Moderate+ NB-UVB / acitretin / methotrexate; start assembling the biologic application criteria
10-20Moderate to severeMeets the NHI biologic threshold (IL-17 / IL-23 / deucravacitinib)
≥ 20SevereBimekizumab, risankizumab and guselkumab are the strongest three; watch for coexisting arthritis

Response endpoints

  • PASI 75: a fall of ≥ 75% after treatment (the conventional target)
  • PASI 90: a fall of ≥ 90% (the routine target for IL-23-class biologics)
  • PASI 100: complete clearance (bimekizumab reaches over 60% at 16 weeks)

What the result means, and what to do next

  • PASI ≥ 10 + BSA ≥ 10% + DLQI ≥ 10 + two failed conventional therapies = eligible to apply for an NHI biologic
  • Choose the biologic around the comorbidity: psoriatic arthritis → IL-17; inflammatory bowel disease → IL-23 or deucravacitinib
  • For scalp psoriasis use PSSI (Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index) instead

Limitations and cautions

Limitations: (1) inter-observer variation is wide and training is needed; (2) it is insensitive in mild psoriasis (a 1-2 point change can accompany obvious clinical improvement); (3) it does not apply to pustular, erythrodermic or inverse forms; (4) severe but localised disease (hands, face) can give a low PASI — supplement with BSA and DLQI; (5) erythema is harder to grade in darker skin.

Original citation

Fredriksson T, Pettersson U. Severe psoriasis—oral therapy with a new retinoid. Dermatologica. 1978;157(4):238-244. PMID 357213
Reich K, et al. Risankizumab IMMvent. Lancet. 2019. PMID 31402114 · Blauvelt A, et al. Bimekizumab BE READY. NEJM. 2021. PMID 33891380
Open the PASI calculator →

03DLQI — Dermatology Life Quality Index

Score 0-30Any skin diseaseFinlay & Khan, 1994

Who it is for

  • Any chronic skin disease from age 16 — psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, urticaria, prurigo nodularis, HS, vitiligo and others
  • NHI biologic threshold: DLQI ≥ 10 for most conditions
  • Tracking what treatment does to quality of life, not just to the appearance of the skin
  • Children use CDLQI (Children's DLQI, ages 4-16); infants use IDQOL

Method

Ten self-rated items, 0-3 each, total 0-30. Each asks how much your skin affected that aspect of life over the past week.

ItemAspect
Q1Itch, soreness, stinging (symptoms)
Q2Embarrassment and self-consciousness (feelings)
Q3Shopping, housework, gardening (daily activities)
Q4Choice of clothing (daily activities)
Q5Social and leisure activities (leisure)
Q6Sport (leisure)
Q7Prevented from working or studying (work / study)
Q8Relationships with partner, friends and family (personal relationships)
Q9Sexual difficulties (personal relationships)
Q10Problems caused by the treatment itself (treatment burden)

Each item: 0 not at all / 1 a little / 2 a lot / 3 very much (score 0 if not relevant).

How to read the score

ScoreImpactWhat it means
0-1No effectThe skin problem is not affecting daily life
2-5MildA small effect on daily life
6-10ModerateA moderate effect on daily life
11-20SevereMeets the NHI biologic threshold (together with disease activity)
21-30Extremely severeSeverely affecting life; consider a biologic plus assessment for psychological comorbidity

What the result means, and what to do next

  • DLQI ≥ 10 means a very large or extremely large negative effect in most chronic skin disease
  • An NHI biologic application usually needs two consecutive assessments both ≥ 10
  • Note that an item marked "not relevant" (N/A) scores 0 — for instance Q9 on sexual difficulties for someone single — which can understate the true impact
  • A sudden fall in score without objective improvement → assess for psychological adaptation or avoidance; a psychiatric comorbidity can mask the picture

Limitations and cautions

Limitations: (1) subjective, and sensitive to mood and cultural differences; (2) Q9 on sexual difficulties is commonly understated in Asia; (3) children and older people need the alternative versions; (4) it cannot replace objective disease assessment; (5) DLQI ≥ 10 alone does not support a biologic application — it must accompany a disease-activity scale (PASI, SCORAD, UAS7 and so on).

Original citation

Finlay AY, Khan GK. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)—a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1994;19(3):210-216. PMID 8033378
Open the DLQI calculator →

04SALT — Severity of Alopecia Tool

Score 0-100Alopecia areataOlsen EA, 2004

Who it is for

  • Scalp hair-loss area in alopecia areata
  • Establishing the indication for a JAK inhibitor (baricitinib, ritlecitinib)
  • Tracking response (SALT-50, SALT-30, SALT-20)
  • Not for: androgenetic alopecia (use Norwood-Ludwig), diffuse telogen effluvium, or cicatricial alopecia

Method — the scalp in four regions

SALT = (vertex % × 0.40) + (occiput % × 0.24) + (left side % × 0.18) + (right side % × 0.18)
  • Vertex (40%): from the hairline to the crown
  • Occiput (24%): the back of the head
  • Left side (18%): above the left ear to the temple
  • Right side (18%): above the right ear to the temple
  • For each region estimate the percentage of that region that is bald (0-100%), in steps of about 5%

In practice: photograph the crown, nape and both sides in a mirror or with a phone, print or sketch the scalp outline, circle the bald areas and estimate the proportion on squared paper. A family member helping makes it more accurate.

How to read the score

ScoreSeverityTreatment strategy it points to
< 20MildIntralesional triamcinolone 5-10 mg/mL ± topical minoxidil 5%
20-50Moderate+ topical immunotherapy with DPCP, methotrexate, or low-dose oral minoxidil as an adjunct
≥ 50SevereBaricitinib (adults) or ritlecitinib (age ≥ 12) — first choice in the Rudnicka 2024 EU consensus

Special forms: alopecia totalis (whole scalp) = SALT 100%; alopecia universalis (whole body) = SALT 100% plus all body hair

Response endpoints

  • SALT-30 / 50 / 75 / 90: the percentage fall in SALT after treatment
  • BRAVE-AA (baricitinib) 4 mg: 38.8% reached SALT ≤ 20 at 36 weeks, against 6.2% on placebo
  • ALLEGRO (ritlecitinib) 50 mg: 23% reached SALT ≤ 20 at 24 weeks, against 2%

What the result means, and what to do next

  • SALT ≥ 50 is the approved indication for a JAK inhibitor — but the EMA warned in 2023 that people aged 65+, or at high cardiovascular, malignancy or VTE risk, should receive one only where no alternative exists
  • Screen before starting: tuberculosis, hepatitis B and C, HIV, full blood count, liver and renal function, lipids, CPK, and any history of malignancy
  • A family history, childhood onset or coexisting atopic dermatitis all carry a poorer prognosis
  • Follow-up: assess response at 12, 24 and 36 weeks after starting

Limitations and cautions

Limitations: (1) estimation error is large, especially in the 30-70% range; (2) it does not assess eyebrows, eyelashes or body hair (the EBA / ELA scales used in ALLEGRO cover those); (3) it is highly subjective, with wide inter-observer variation; (4) the AAS (Alopecia Areata Scale, King 2022) is a newer alternative that includes brows and lashes.

Original citation

Olsen EA, et al. Alopecia areata investigational assessment guidelines—Part II. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;51(3):440-447. PMID 15337988
Rudnicka L, et al. European expert consensus on systemic AA treatment. JEADV. 2024;38(4):687-694. PMID 38205946
Open the SALT calculator →

05UAS7 — Urticaria Activity Score over 7 days

Score 0-42Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU)EAACI 2018

Who it is for

  • Daily activity tracking in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU); it must be recorded on seven consecutive days
  • Establishing the indication for omalizumab under the NHI PASS assessment
  • Not for: acute urticaria (< 6 weeks), inducible urticaria (use a trigger threshold test), or angioedema

Method — a diary over seven consecutive days

UAS7 = Σ (wheal count + itch) from day 1 to day 7
ItemDaily score
Wheals0 = none / 1 = 1-10 / 2 = 10-50 / 3 = > 50 or large confluent areas
Itch0 = none / 1 = mild (noticeable but not troublesome) / 2 = moderate (interferes with the day but sleep is possible) / 3 = severe (interferes with the day and disturbs sleep)

Up to 6 points a day (wheals 0-3 + itch 0-3), so at most 42 over seven days. The free EAACI urticaria diary app pairs well with it.

How to read the score

ScoreActivityTreatment strategy it points to
0Complete controlThe maintenance target is met; review periodically with a view to stepping down
1-6Well controlledContinue the antihistamine and consider stepping down after 4-6 months
7-15MildIncrease the antihistamine to four times the standard dose (2022 EAACI)
16-27Moderate+ omalizumab 300 mg q4w (NHI PASS application)
28-42Severe+ omalizumab (escalable to 600 mg q2w) ± ciclosporin (off-label)

What the result means, and what to do next

  • The treatment target is UAS7 ≤ 6 (well controlled); UAS7 = 0 is the ideal
  • UAS7 and the UCT (Urticaria Control Test, 4 items) complement each other: the UCT is easier to remember, UAS7 is more precise
  • Around 30% of CSU patients respond inadequately to omalizumab, particularly the type IIb autoimmune group with low IgE and high anti-TPO IgG
  • On the horizon: remibrutinib (BTK) and dupilumab (FDA-approved 2024) as alternatives after omalizumab failure

Limitations and cautions

Limitations: (1) it needs seven consecutive days of recording, and adherence is often poor; (2) it does not cover angioedema (use AAS / AAS7); (3) it does not apply to inducible urticaria; (4) self-rating tends to under- or over-state; (5) UAS7 = 0 with continuing distress → assess for anxiety, which coexists with depression or anxiety in 7-29% of CSU.

Original citation

Zuberbier T, et al. EAACI/GA²LEN/EuroGuiDerm/APAAACI guideline for urticaria. Allergy. 2022;77(3):734-766. PMID 34536239
Kolkhir P, et al. Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A Review. JAMA. 2024;332(17):1464-1477. PMID 39320923
Open the UAS7 calculator →

06GAGS — Global Acne Grading System

Score 0-44Acne vulgarisDoshi-Zaheer-Stiller, 1997

Who it is for

  • Severity assessment for any acne, in adolescents and adults alike
  • Establishing the NHI indication for oral isotretinoin
  • Tracking response to treatment

Method

GAGS = Σ (grade of the most severe lesion at a site × the site's weight)
SiteWeight
Forehead×2
Right cheek×2
Left cheek×2
Nose×1
Chin×1
Chest / upper back×3

Grade the most severe lesion at each site:

  • 0 = no lesions
  • 1 = ≥1 comedone
  • 2 = ≥1 papule
  • 3 = ≥1 pustule
  • 4 = ≥1 nodule or cyst

How to read the score

ScoreSeverityTreatment strategy it points to (AAD 2024)
1-18MildTopical benzoyl peroxide + adapalene 0.1% or tretinoin (strongly recommended in 2024)
19-30Moderate+ oral doxycycline 100 mg BID for 8-12 weeks, spironolactone (in women), clascoterone
31-38SevereOral isotretinoin (NHI criteria: severe inflammation, repeated failure, or scarring risk)
≥ 39Extremely severeIsotretinoin + intralesional corticosteroid, intervening early to avoid scarring

What the result means, and what to do next

  • GAGS does not assess scarring, post-inflammatory marks or psychological impact — pair it with ECCA (scarring) and DLQI (psychological)
  • A woman with premenstrual flares, jawline or neck distribution, hirsutism and irregular periods → consider endocrine assessment for PCOS
  • New-onset acne in a woman over 30 → exclude polycystic ovary syndrome, an androgen-secreting tumour and menstrual irregularity
  • Before oral isotretinoin: liver function, lipids, and a pregnancy test — with strict contraception for anyone of childbearing potential

Limitations and cautions

Limitations: (1) it does not assess scarring (use ECCA or the Goodman scar scale); (2) it does not assess post-inflammatory erythema or hyperpigmentation, which matter in Asian skin; (3) grading by the most severe lesion can overstate — a single nodule scores 4; (4) the IGA (Investigator's Global Assessment, 0-4) is simpler; (5) the six-grade IAA-GES has become common in recent FDA trials.

Original citation

Doshi A, Zaheer A, Stiller MJ. A comparison of current acne grading systems and proposal of a novel system. Int J Dermatol. 1997;36(6):416-418. PMID 9248884
Reynolds RV, et al. AAD acne guidelines 2024. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024;90(5):1006.e1-e30. PMID 38300170
Open the GAGS calculator →

07MASI — Melasma Area & Severity Index

Score 0-48MelasmaKimbrough-Green, 1994

Who it is for

  • Severity and treatment response in melasma
  • Not for: solar lentigines, naevus of Ota or Hori's naevus (use OMRA / ABRA), or post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (use PGA)
  • The simplified mMASI (modified MASI), which drops the homogeneity item, is now widely used

Method

MASI = 0.3×Af×(Df+Hf) + 0.3×Ar×(Dr+Hr) + 0.3×Al×(Dl+Hl) + 0.1×Ac×(Dc+Hc)
f = forehead / r = right cheek / l = left cheek / c = chin
  • Four facial regions, weighted: forehead ×0.3, right cheek ×0.3, left cheek ×0.3, chin ×0.1
  • Area A (0-6): the same grades as PASI (0 = 0%, 1 = <10%, 2 = 10-29% … 6 = 90-100%)
  • Darkness D (0-4): 0 = absent / 1 = slight / 2 = moderate / 3 = marked / 4 = severe
  • Homogeneity H (0-4): how uniform the colour is within the patch, 0 = minimal / 4 = completely uniform

How to read the score

ScoreSeverityTreatment strategy it points to
< 8MildStrict photoprotection (SPF 50+ containing iron oxide) + azelaic acid 15-20% / niacinamide
8-24Moderate+ triple combination cream (hydroquinone 4% + tretinoin + fluocinolone) for 8-12 weeks, then maintenance
≥ 24Severe+ oral tranexamic acid 250 mg BID-TID + low-fluence 1064 nm Q-switched toning; cysteamine 5%

Response endpoints

  • MASI-50: a fall of ≥ 50% after treatment (clinically meaningful)
  • A typical course takes 8-16 weeks before the change is obvious

What the result means, and what to do next

  • Melasma cannot be cured, only controlled — it darkens again once treatment stops, and photoprotection is lifelong
  • Oral tranexamic acid is contraindicated with a history of deep vein thrombosis, in pregnancy, and with the combined oral contraceptive pill (thrombotic risk)
  • Conventional high-fluence lasers can drive melasma darker — use low-fluence toning (picosecond) instead
  • In pregnancy and breastfeeding: photoprotection plus azelaic acid (L3, safe); avoid hydroquinone, tranexamic acid and the triple combination cream

Limitations and cautions

Limitations: (1) subjective, with wide inter-observer variation; (2) homogeneity (H) is hard to judge in the deep brown melasma common in Asian skin; (3) it does not distinguish dermal from epidermal melasma (a Wood's lamp helps); (4) before-and-after photographs must use fixed lighting, distance and angle; (5) mMASI, without H, has better inter-observer reliability.

Original citation

Kimbrough-Green CK, et al. Topical retinoic acid for melasma in black patients. Arch Dermatol. 1994;130(6):727-733. PMID 8002643
Lima PB, et al. Topical 5% cysteamine vs 4% hydroquinone in melasma. Int J Dermatol. 2020;59(12):1531-1536. PMID 32954510
Open the MASI calculator →

08Hurley staging — Hidradenitis Suppurativa Staging

Stage I-IIIHidradenitis suppurativa (HS)Hurley HJ, 1989

Who it is for

  • Severity staging for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS, acne inversa)
  • Establishing the indication for conditionally NHI-funded adalimumab (Hurley II/III)
  • Not for: a simple furuncle, acute folliculitis, or pilonidal sinus

Method — three stages

StageDefinition
Stage I, mildOne or more isolated abscesses or nodules, with no sinus tracts and no scarring
Stage II, moderateRecurrent abscesses with sinus tracts and scarring, but the lesions remain separated
Stage III, severeMultiple interconnected tracts and abscesses, with extensive scarring and fibrosis

How to read it, and the treatment it points to

StageTreatment strategy it points to
Stage ITopical clindamycin 1% + a short course of oral doxycycline 50-100 mg BID for 12 weeks + lifestyle measures (weight loss, stopping smoking, loose clothing) + incision and drainage
Stage IILong-course oral clindamycin 300 mg + rifampicin 600 mg, both BID for 10-12 weeks; acitretin or antiandrogens; adalimumab (conditionally NHI-funded); local deroofing
Stage IIIAdalimumab + wide excision + flap reconstruction; secukinumab, the IL-17 inhibitor approved by the FDA in 2023, is a newer option

Supporting scales

  • Sartorius score: a finer counting system (lesion count × anatomical site × distance)
  • IHS4 (International HS Severity Score System): nodules + abscesses ×2 + tracts ×4, used to track trial response
  • HiSCR (HS Clinical Response): a fall of ≥ 50% in abscess and nodule count with no increase in tracts counts as a response — the adalimumab trial endpoint

What the result means, and what to do next

  • HS is diagnosed an average of 7-10 years late, often mistaken for boils or folliculitis; intervening early avoids irreversible tract formation
  • Hurley II/III + DLQI ≥ 10 + failure of two conventional therapies = the NHI threshold for adalimumab
  • Comorbidity is common — Crohn's disease, psoriatic arthritis, pyoderma gangrenosum, metabolic syndrome, depression — and should be screened for systematically
  • Stopping smoking, losing weight and treating consistently are what determine the long-term result

Limitations and cautions

Limitations: (1) three stages are too coarse, and stage II covers a very wide range; (2) it says nothing about current activity — someone can be stage III with no new lesions; (3) it is unsuited to tracking response (use IHS4 or HiSCR); (4) it is subjective, and telling a tract from a scar takes experience.

Original citation

Hurley HJ. Axillary hyperhidrosis, apocrine bromhidrosis, hidradenitis suppurativa, and familial benign pemphigus: surgical approach. In: Dermatologic Surgery. 1989:729-739.
Zouboulis CC, et al. European S1 guideline for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa. JEADV. 2015;29(4):619-644. PMID 25640693
View Hurley staging →

09Norwood-Hamilton / Ludwig — clinical grading of androgenetic alopecia

Men I-VII / women I-IIIAndrogenetic alopecia (AGA)Norwood 1975 · Ludwig 1977

Who it is for

  • Male pattern hair loss → use Norwood-Hamilton (I-VII)
  • Female pattern hair loss → use Ludwig (I-III), or Olsen for the central pattern
  • Not for: alopecia areata (use SALT), diffuse telogen effluvium (use a pull test with trichoscopy), or cicatricial alopecia

Norwood-Hamilton grades (men)

GradeFeatures
INo obvious loss, or minimal hairline recession
IIMild M-shaped hairline recession
IIIMarked M-shaped recession, possibly with crown thinning
III vertexObvious crown thinning plus a grade III hairline
IVMarked hairline recession plus crown baldness, with a bridge of hair between them
VExtensive crown baldness, the bridge thinning, only a rim remaining behind
VICrown and frontal baldness merge and the bridge disappears
VIIOnly the horseshoe of occipital and lateral hair remains — the most advanced

Ludwig grades (women)

GradeFeatures
IMild central thinning with the frontal hairline preserved
IIMarked central thinning with the frontal hairline preserved
IIINear-complete central loss, the frontal hairline still preserved

The female pattern: the Christmas tree sign — the central parting widens into a triangle while the frontal hairline is preserved, unlike the male pattern.

Treatment strategy it points to

GradeMenWomen
Mild
(I-II)
Topical minoxidil 5% BID
± finasteride 1 mg/day
Topical minoxidil 2-5%
± LDOM 0.5-1.25 mg/day (Olsen 2025)
± spironolactone 100 mg
Moderate
(III-IV)
Finasteride + minoxidil, the standard pair
± PRP injections
discuss transplantation
Minoxidil + spironolactone as the mainstay
+ LDOM 1.25-2.5 mg
± PRP
Severe
(V-VII)
Transplantation (FUE / FUT) with continued medical maintenanceTransplantation with continued medical therapy

What the result means, and what to do next

  • Minoxidil cannot be stopped — the benefit is lost 3-6 months after stopping, and within two years the loss returns to where it would have been
  • Finasteride side effects: reduced libido or erectile difficulty in about 1-2%, reversible on stopping; post-finasteride syndrome is very rare
  • Finasteride and dutasteride are contraindicated in women because of teratogenicity, even before a pregnancy
  • Take finasteride for six months before transplantation to stabilise the loss, so the untransplanted areas do not continue receding two to five years later

Limitations and cautions

Limitations: (1) inter-observer variation is wide for early Norwood grades (I-II); (2) Ludwig does not suit women with frontal recession (use Olsen's central pattern grading); (3) it does not measure shaft miniaturisation, which trichoscopy detects far earlier; (4) some female pattern loss coexists with androgen excess — check testosterone, DHEAS and screen for PCOS.

Original citation

Norwood OT. Male pattern baldness: classification and incidence. South Med J. 1975;68(11):1359-1365. PMID 1188424
Ludwig E. Classification of the types of androgenetic alopecia in the female. Br J Dermatol. 1977;97(3):247-254. PMID 921894
Olsen EA, et al. Recommendations for the safe and effective use of topical and oral minoxidil. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2025;93(2):457-465. PMID 40090466
Open the Norwood-Ludwig grading tool →

10Fitzpatrick skin phototype — a reference for photoprotection and laser safety

Type I-VIAll of dermatology and aestheticsFitzpatrick TB, 1975

Who it is for

  • Pre-procedure assessment for any laser, chemical peel or aesthetic treatment, predicting the risk of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation
  • Stratifying photoprotection needs and skin cancer risk
  • It does not simply mean skin colour — it reflects how skin reacts to sun exposure, i.e. photosensitivity

Method — two dimensions

Combines your unexposed baseline skin colour with how it reacts after 30-60 minutes of early-summer midday sun.

TypeUnexposed skin colourReaction to sunTypical populations
IVery pale, often freckledAlways burns, never tansNorthern Europe; red hair, blue eyes
IIPale, lightly freckledBurns easily, tans minimallyNorthern Europe
IIIFair to creamSometimes burns, tans graduallySouthern Europe; lighter East Asian skin
IVLight brown to oliveRarely burns, tans easilyMost people in Taiwan and East Asia; the Mediterranean
VBrownVery rarely burns, tans deeplySouth-east Asia, India, Latin America
VIDark brown to blackNever burnsPeople of African descent

What each type means in practice

TypePhotoprotectionLaser safetySkin cancer risk
I-IISPF 50+ PA++++ strongly advisedMost wavelengths are safeHigh (BCC, SCC, melanoma)
III-IVSPF 30-50 PA+++Prone to post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation — test a 1 cm² patch first and watch it for four weeksIntermediate
V-VISPF 30+, to avoid post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation1064 nm Nd:YAG is safer; 532, 694 and 755 nm readily cause pigmentationLow, but easily diagnosed late — SCC carries a worse prognosis here

What the result means, and what to do next

  • Most Taiwanese are type III-IV — the risk of darkening after a laser or peel is high, so photoprotect strictly for at least four weeks
  • Types I-II should have a full skin examination annually, particularly over the age of 50
  • Skin cancer risk is low in types V-VI, but SCC often arises on the sole or under a nail and is easily missed, since pigment obscures it
  • Sunscreen containing iron oxide matters particularly for Asian types III-VI, because it blocks the visible light that drives melasma

Limitations and cautions

Limitations: (1) it relies on self-report, with its own biases; (2) the same person answers differently in winter and summer; (3) it does not directly measure melanin — a Mexameter or spectrophotometer does; (4) the international classification does not fit Asian populations well, and the ITA (Individual Typology Angle) is finer; (5) phototype is not an absolute cancer risk — genetics, cumulative UV exposure and family history matter more.

Original citation

Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol. 1988;124(6):869-871. PMID 3377516
Pasquali P, et al. Iron oxide-containing sunscreens for melasma. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020;19(3):671-675. PMID 31736195
Open the Fitzpatrick typing tool →

How to use these — a scale is a tool, not a diagnosis

  • A scale makes something subjective measurable, so you can describe how your disease has changed precisely rather than as a vague "a bit better than last time".
  • The trend matters more than the number: a single score means little, and only 4-12 weeks of consecutive readings show a direction. Photographs and a diary help.
  • Use more than one: disease activity (SCORAD / PASI) + quality of life (DLQI) + psychological comorbidity (PHQ-9 / GAD-7) together give the full picture.
  • An NHI biologic application requires a specialist's own assessment and signature; a self-rated score is for reference only and cannot be submitted on its own.
  • None of the scales on this site carries advertising, sponsorship or affiliate links, and every society consensus cited can be checked on PubMed. If you spot an error, please email us.
Further reading: for the full patient guides see the article index; for plain-English explanations of the terminology see the dermatology glossary. For assessment, prescribing and treatment itself, please see a dermatologist in person.