Skip to main content
English version. Prefer Traditional Chinese? Switch to Chinese
Atopic Dermatitis · Complete Guide

Atopic Dermatitis Complete Guide — Treatment, Comorbidity, 6 Myths

Dr. Yi-Jia Chen · Integrating Hanifin & Rajka 1980 + UK Working Party + Sidbury 2023 JAAD + Davis 2024/2025 JAAD · Updated 2026-05-14
Reminder · This article synthesizes Hanifin & Rajka / UK Working Party / Sidbury 2023 / Davis 2024-2025 international guidelines for patient education and resident-level reference. Individualized AD treatment (topical potency, biologic or JAK choice, phototherapy strength) must be decided by a dermatologist based on age, severity, comorbidities, and Taiwan NHI coverage. Do NOT self-adjust corticosteroid dose; severe complications (cellulitis, eczema herpeticum) require immediate medical attention. This site carries no advertising, sponsorship, or commercial endorsement.
TL;DR:AD is a chronic inflammatory disease arising from a triad of barrier dysfunction, Th2-skewed immunity, and microbiome dysbiosis. Diagnosis is clinical (Hanifin & Rajka or UK Working Party criteria); severity is graded with EASI / SCORAD / IGA / POEM / DLQI. Three-tier treatment: daily moisturizer foundation; flare with topical TCS / TCI / PDE-4 / JAK / tapinarof; moderate-severe with 4 biologics (dupilumab / tralokinumab / lebrikizumab / nemolizumab), 3 oral JAKs, or phototherapy.

1. Epidemiology and natural history

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common chronic inflammatory skin disease in children. Global pediatric prevalence is 15–30% (2–10% in adults); Taiwan pediatric prevalence is ~8–10% (Saunes 2024 systematic review; Taiwan NHI data). Onset peaks before age 1 in 60% and before age 5 in 85%; a second peak in adolescence/adulthood accounts for ~25% of adult AD cases.

The atopic march describes the sequential development of food allergy → asthma → allergic rhinitis after AD, particularly in severe infantile AD; Hill (JAMA Pediatr 2014) and Paller (JACI 2019) frame this as the rationale for early barrier repair and early oral food tolerance strategies.

Natural history: infantile AD (0–2 yr) clears before age 5 in ~60%; childhood AD (2–12 yr) improves notably before puberty in 40–60%; 30–50% persist into adulthood. Adult-onset AD (about a quarter of adult AD) is typically more chronic and treatment-resistant.

2. Pathophysiology — the triad

AD pathophysiology is a self-amplifying triangle of barrier dysfunction, Th2-skewed immunity, and microbiome dysbiosis. Modern targeted agents almost all sit on the second leg, blocking specific Th2 cytokine axes.

① Barrier dysfunction

② Th2-skewed immunity — mapped to drug targets

Acute lesions are Th2/Th22-driven; IL-4 and IL-13 impair barrier repair and drive IgE class-switching; IL-31 is the dominant pruritus cytokine; TSLP is the keratinocyte-derived upstream alarmin. Chronic, lichenified lesions (especially in Asian populations) recruit Th1/Th17. The table below maps each biologic to its cytokine axis:

AgentTargetOne-line mechanism
DupilumabIL-4RαBlocks both IL-4 and IL-13 (shared α subunit) — addresses barrier and inflammation simultaneously
TralokinumabIL-13Selectively neutralizes IL-13 (high affinity); IL-4 signaling preserved → lower conjunctivitis rate than dupilumab
LebrikizumabIL-13High-affinity IL-13; maintenance can extend to q4w (its dosing advantage)
NemolizumabIL-31RATargets the itch pathway specifically; significant pruritus relief by week 1 — best for itch-predominant patients
Upa / Abro / BariJAK1 (±2)Inhibit JAK1-STAT6 — shuts off IL-4/13/31, IFN, and TSLP signaling simultaneously

③ Skin microbiome dysbiosis

For the distinction (allergic vs irritant), Patch Test indications, allergen avoidance, and treatment ladder, see the complete contact dermatitis guide.

3. Diagnosis — two criteria sets and five differentials

AD is a purely clinical diagnosis; serum IgE, TARC, and allergen panels are not diagnostic and not recommended for routine use (Werfel 2024 S3).

Hanifin & Rajka 1980 — 4 majors + 23 minors

Diagnosis requires ≥ 3 of 4 major plus ≥ 3 of 23 minor features.

UK Working Party 1994 (Williams) — clinic-friendly

Required: itchy skin in the past 12 months, PLUS ≥ 3 of: ① flexural involvement (antecubital, popliteal, anterior ankle/neck; cheeks in < 4 yr); ② personal atopy (or first-degree relative if < 4 yr); ③ generalized dry skin in the past year; ④ visible flexural eczema (or cheeks/forehead in < 4 yr); ⑤ onset before age 2 (only applicable in those ≥ 4 yr). Williams 1994 BJD, PMID 7918015.

Differential — 5 quick rule-outs

DiseaseKey featurevs AD
Seborrheic dermatitisGreasy scalp; yellow greasy scale at nasolabial folds, glabella, retroauricularSebaceous-rich distribution; itch mild
PsoriasisSharply demarcated erythema + thick silvery scale; Auspitz signExtensor predominance (knees, elbows, scalp, sacrum); nail changes
ScabiesHousehold clustering, nocturnal itch, finger webs/axilla/waist/genitalia; burrowsAsymmetric, no flexural atopy history; mite on microscopy is diagnostic
Contact dermatitisSharp edges conforming to the irritant or allergen (watch, belt, hair dye)Non-flexural; patch testing confirms allergen
Early CTCL (MF)Persistent patches > 6 mo, treatment-resistant, predilection for covered sites (buttock, trunk)Adult-onset eczema-like plaques without atopy history → biopsy

4. Severity assessment

ToolDomainRangeWhenLimitation
EASI4 regions × 4 signs (erythema, papulation, excoriation, lichenification)0-72Gold standard for trials; EASI-75 is the primary endpointTime-consuming; inter-rater variability
SCORADA area + B intensity + C subjective (itch + sleep)0-103Common in European clinics; includes patient subjective dataSubjective C-component confounded by mental comorbidity
IGAInvestigator global assessment (0 = clear, 4 = severe)0-4Fast in clinic; Taiwan NHI biologic threshold IGA ≥ 3Low resolution; misses focal severity changes
POEMPatient 7-day, 7-item PRO (dryness, itch, weeping, cracking, flaking, thickening, sleep)0-28Completed in 5 min; captures the patient perspectiveNot suitable as a trial primary endpoint
DLQI + itch NRSLife impact / itch 0–10DLQI 0–30, itch NRS 0–10DLQI > 10 is the NHI biologic threshold; itch NRS captures the patient's chief complaintDLQI is not AD-specific

On-site calculators: EASI · SCORAD · DLQI · POEM

5. Comorbidity systems screening — every visit

AD is no longer viewed as "skin only." Population studies (Drucker JID 2017; Schonmann BJD 2020) confirm AD as a systemic inflammatory disease linked to mental health, cardiovascular, bone, and infection risk — treatment choices (especially biologic vs JAK) must factor these in.

① Atopic march

(Sources: Hill DA et al. JAMA Pediatr 2014; Paller AS et al. JACI 2019)

② Mental health

③ Cardiovascular (adult severe)

Severe AD: MI HR ~1.4, stroke HR ~1.2 (Silverberg JID 2015; Andersen BJD 2018 nationwide). Mechanism: systemic IL-13/IL-4-driven endothelial inflammation overlapping the IL-1β/IL-6 atherosclerosis axis. Clinical: routine BP, lipids, glucose in adult severe AD; ASCVD assessment before any JAK inhibitor (see treatment section).

④ Bone health

Long-term high-potency topical steroids (daily, body-wide, ≥ 12 mo) or cumulative oral prednisolone ≥ 5 mg/day × 3 mo lower BMD by ~3–5%. DEXA indicators: meet either threshold → baseline DEXA, repeat every 1–2 yr; supplement vitamin D + calcium, smoking/alcohol cessation, weight-bearing exercise.

⑤ Skin infection

⑥ 5-minute follow-up checklist

Moisturizer dosing, bathing, TCS class 1-7, TCI, crisaborole, topical ruxolitinib, wet wrap — see the complete AD topical treatment guide.

6. Treatment ladder

STEP 0 — Foundation (everyone, daily)

STEP 1 — Acute topical

Topical corticosteroids (TCS) — US 7-class system: Class 1 = ultra-potent (clobetasol 0.05%), Class 7 = lowest (hydrocortisone 1%). Site matching: face / infants / folds → Class 6–7; trunk and limbs → Class 3–5; thick palms/soles short-term → Class 1–2.

ClassRepresentativeSiteCaveat
1 ultra-potentClobetasol 0.05%, HalobetasolThickened palms/soles, lichenification (short)Avoid face, infants; ≤ 2 weeks
2–3 highMometasone 0.1%, Betamethasone valerate 0.1%Trunk, limbs flare≤ 4 weeks, then proactive
4–5 midTriamcinolone 0.1%, Fluocinolone 0.025%Most moderate lesionsReassess before long-term use
6–7 lowDesonide 0.05%, Hydrocortisone 1%Face, folds, infantsFirst-line in these sites

FTU dosing: 1 FTU (~0.5 g) covers ~2 adult palms. Proactive maintenance: post-flare, twice-weekly TCS or TCI on relapse-prone sites — relapse reduction 30–60% (Wollenberg 2008; Sidbury 2023 strong rec, evidence level A).

Steroid-sparing topicals — five options: all non-steroidal; differ mainly in age range, site, and mechanism.

AgentMoAAgeLocal AEFDA / launch
Tacrolimus 0.03 / 0.1%TCI (calcineurin)≥ 2 yr / ≥ 16 yrApplication burning (1–2 wk)2000
Pimecrolimus 1%TCI≥ 3 moMild stinging2001
Crisaborole 2%PDE-4≥ 3 moApplication pain ~5%2016
Ruxolitinib 1.5%JAK1/2≥ 12 yrLocal erythema; minimal systemic absorption2021

STEP 2 — Moderate: phototherapy

NB-UVB (narrowband UVB, 311 nm): 2–3×/week × 8–12 weeks; average 24 sessions to reach EASI-75. Safe in children, pregnancy, and lactation; main barrier is time and transportation. The bridge of choice when topicals fail but biologic thresholds aren't yet met.

BAD 2022 NB-UVB phototherapy guideline key points (moderate-severe AD)Goulden 2022, BJD
  • R16 (↑↑) strong recommendation: NB-UVB is the first-line phototherapy for moderate-severe atopic eczema (superior to broadband UVB and UVA1)
  • R17 (GPP): during phototherapy, continue daily emollient, combine as needed with short-term topical corticosteroid (TCS) to control subacute inflammation
  • R18 (GPP):stabilize severe acute flares before initiating phototherapy (avoid phototherapy-induced Koebner / flare)
  • R19 (GPP): for refractory cases consider combining NB-UVB with methotrexate or ciclosporin (avoid long-term combination with azathioprine due to increased skin-cancer risk)
  • R3 (↑↑) starting dose: formal formal MED (Minimal Erythema Dose) testing is more accurate; Fitzpatrick skin-type-based starting dose is an alternative

STEP 3 — Moderate-severe: biologics + JAK + conventional

Biologics (4 agents)

AgentTargetEASI-75 wk 16Key AENote
DupilumabIL-4Rα~50%Conjunctivitis 10–20%Approved from age 6 months; also indicated in asthma, EoE, prurigo nodularis
TralokinumabIL-13~33%Less conjunctivitis than dupi≥ 12 yr
LebrikizumabIL-13~50%Conjunctivitis ~8%FDA 2024; maintenance q4w (advantage)
NemolizumabIL-31RA~37%Headache, infectionFDA 2024; itch-predominant patients

Oral JAK inhibitors (3 agents)

AgentDoseEASI-75 wk 16Class black-box
Upadacitinib15 / 30 mg QD~70%VTE / MACE / herpes zoster / malignancy / serious infection
Abrocitinib100 / 200 mg QD~60%
Baricitinib2 / 4 mg QD~45%

ORAL Surveillance (Ytterberg NEJM 2022): in RA patients ≥ 50 yr with ≥ 1 CV risk factor, JAKs raised MACE / cancer / VTE vs TNF inhibitors — FDA applied this as a class label. Pre-Tx workup: CBC with differential, LFT/RFT, lipid panel, HBV/HCV, HIV, TB (IGRA + CXR), zoster vaccine if ≥ 50 yr.

Conventional immunomodulators (NHI bridge / out-of-pocket): cyclosporine 3–5 mg/kg/d short-term (≤ 1 yr) is the bridge of choice; methotrexate 7.5–15 mg/week; azathioprine 100–150 mg/d (TPMT not routinely tested in Taiwan). Largely supplanted by dupilumab but remain useful when biologics aren't reimbursable.

STEP 4 — Taiwan NHI status (2026)

Reimbursement conditions change frequently; refer to official NHI announcements.

For pediatric AD moisturizer routines, bathing, food introduction, topical TCI, and avoiding steroid phobia, see the complete pediatric AD guide.

For pediatric dose adjustments, pregnancy/lactation safety, elderly JAK contraindications, and refractory AD switching, see AD in special populations.

7. Special populations — quick reference

8. Six common myths

Myth 1: Topical steroids always thin, darken, or weaken the skin
Truth: short-term, site-matched potency is extremely safe; true atrophy mainly occurs after ≥ 12 months of daily potent steroid use

See "STEP 1" for class-by-site matching. Face, folds, and infants take Class 6–7 only; trunk and limbs in flare use Class 3–5 for ≤ 4 weeks then transition to proactive. Atrophy, purpura, and telangiectasia almost exclusively follow wrong-potency + wrong-site + daily continuous use ≥ 12 months.

Myth 2: Topical steroids are addictive; stopping triggers a flare (TSW)
Truth: TSW (topical steroid withdrawal) is real but rare (estimated < 0.1%); most "withdrawal" is undercontrolled chronic inflammation

Hajar 2015 JAAD systematic review defines TSW as long-term (≥ 1 yr) daily mid-high-potency use on face/genitals, with redness/burning/oozing extending beyond original lesions 1–2 weeks after self-discontinuation. Short-term use plus proactive maintenance does not cause TSW; suspected cases should be evaluated by dermatology, not self-tapered.

Myth 3: Children outgrow eczema on their own
Truth: ~60% of infantile AD remits before age 5; childhood-/adult-onset often persists. Early barrier control reduces atopic-march risk

See Section 1 (natural history). The cost of "wait it out" is repeated scratching → barrier disruption → allergen sensitization → increased food allergy / asthma / rhinitis risk (Hill JAMA Pediatr 2014). Early aggressive moisturization + inflammation control is the strongest evidence-based prevention strategy for the atopic march.

Myth 4: Scratching is harmless — it doesn't hurt
Truth: the itch-scratch cycle is the core driver of AD progression. Nemolizumab (anti-IL-31R, FDA 2024) demonstrates that itch interruption alone improves overall disease activity

Itch → scratch → barrier disruption → allergen + S. aureus penetration → IL-31 / IL-4 / IL-13 release → more itch → lichenification. Breaking the cycle: nighttime antihistamine, short nails, cold compress, generous moisturization, full-strength TCS in flare, and escalation to dupilumab / nemolizumab when needed. In the ARCADIA trial, nemolizumab achieved significant itch relief by week 1 — proof that targeting itch alone changes the disease.

Myth 5: Allergy testing reveals the root cause; avoidance cures AD
Truth: 90% of adult AD has no single causative allergen; positive IgE ≠ clinical allergy; blanket food avoidance causes pediatric malnutrition

Allergy testing detects sensitization, not clinical allergy. The root pathology is the barrier + Th2 + microbiome triangle (Section 2). Pediatric food allergy < 30% and most outgrow by age 5. Testing is meaningful only with: ① clearly time-locked immediate reaction (within 30 min – 2 hr); ② recurrent eczema in the same anatomic site (patch test for contact); ③ severe infantile AD with multiple food reactions on history.

Myth 6: Folk, herbal, or "natural" remedies are safer
Truth: Taiwan FDA inspections have repeatedly found "natural" / "herbal" AD creams adulterated with clobetasol, mercury, or arsenic; natural ≠ safe

Patients believing "no steroids" apply liberally long-term — and ironically receive higher-potency Class 1 steroid exposure than any prescriber would give, with predictable atrophy and withdrawal. Heavy metals absorb transcutaneously, causing renal and neurologic damage. Discuss any alternative remedy with your dermatologist; the genuinely non-steroidal options are all prescription (TCI, crisaborole, roflumilast, tapinarof, ruxolitinib).

9. Patient FAQ

Q1: How do I pick a moisturizer?

Pick any product containing ceramide, glycerin, or petrolatum; cost is irrelevant. La Roche-Posay Lipikar AP+M, Avène Xeracalm, Cetaphil RestoraDerm, Aveeno, Bioderma Atoderm are all reasonable choices. Volume matters more than brand: ≥ 1×/day, within 3 min of bathing, 200–400 g/week for adults.

Q2: How long until AD clears?

See Myth 3 and Section 1 (natural history). Infantile AD remits before age 5 in ~60%; childhood- and adult-onset typically persist, but biologics and JAKs now keep most moderate-severe adult AD nearly asymptomatic.

Q3: Do I really need to avoid certain foods?

90% of adult AD does not require dietary restriction. Children avoid foods only when an IgE-mediated allergy is confirmed (clear temporal relationship + positive antibody); blanket avoidance of dairy / eggs / seafood causes malnutrition and growth delay. A positive 100-panel test ≠ true allergy (see Myth 5).

Q4: How long can I keep using my steroid cream?

No fixed limit during acute flare — match potency to site (face/infant Class 6–7; trunk Class 3–5; palms/soles short-term Class 1–2). Daily potent TCS use > 3 months should transition to TCI / crisaborole / roflumilast / tapinarof / ruxolitinib or escalate to dupilumab. See STEP 1.

Q5: What does Taiwan NHI cover?

See STEP 4. In short: topical TCS / TCI / crisaborole are reimbursed; cyclosporine has conditional coverage; dupilumab and upadacitinib (since 2024-04) are conditionally reimbursed for moderate-severe adult AD; tralokinumab / lebrikizumab / nemolizumab are out-of-pocket or unavailable.

10. Bottom line — 4 things in AD care

  1. Daily moisturization is the foundation (80% of treatment effect) — ceramide-based, applied within 3 minutes of bathing
  2. Don't fear potency-matched steroids in flare — extinguish acute inflammation; chronic inflammation harms the skin far more than properly used short-term TCS
  3. Don't tough it out in moderate-severe disease: dupilumab / JAKs have transformed prognosis — escalate when mid-potency TCS + TCI fails
  4. Screen comorbidity: mental health (PHQ-2), CV (before JAK), infection (eczema herpeticum is an emergency), bone (cumulative steroid exposure) — these decisions feed directly into drug choice

Further reading:Related atopic dermatitis deep-dive articles: AD topical treatment — complete patient guideAD comorbidities & special populationsContact dermatitis (differential diagnosis)Infant & pediatric AD — complete care

Further reading:see "25 most-asked dermatology questions〉。

References

  1. Diagnosis and classification
  2. Hanifin JM, Rajka G. Diagnostic features of atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl. 1980;92:44-47.
  3. Williams HC, Burney PG, Hay RJ, et al. The U.K. Working Party's diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 1994;131(3):383-396. PMID: 7918015.
  4. Eichenfield LF, Tom WL, Chamlin SL, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis. Section 1. Diagnosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70(2):338-351. PMID: 24290431.
  5. Severity assessment
  6. Hanifin JM, Thurston M, Omoto M, et al. The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI). Exp Dermatol. 2001;10(1):11-18.
  7. Kunz B, Oranje AP, Labreze L, et al. Clinical validation and guidelines for the SCORAD index. Dermatology. 1997;195(1):10-19.
  8. Charman CR, Venn AJ, Williams HC. The Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140(12):1513-1519.
  9. Finlay AY, Khan GK. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Clin Exp Dermatol. 1994;19(3):210-216.
  10. Guidelines and consensus
  11. Sidbury R, Davis DMR, Cohen DE, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis with topical therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023;89(1):e1-e20.
  12. Davis DMR, Drucker AM, Alikhan A, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis in adults with phototherapy and systemic therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024;90(2):e43-e56.
  13. Goulden V, Ling TC, Babakinejad P, et al. British Association of Dermatologists and British Photodermatology Group guidelines for narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy 2022. Br J Dermatol. 2022;187(3):295-308. [Source]
  14. Davis DMR, et al. AAD focused update on atopic dermatitis topical and systemic therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2025;93(3):745.e1-e7.
  15. Werfel T, Heratizadeh A, Aberer W, et al. S3 Guideline atopic dermatitis Part 1 — General aspects, topical and non-drug therapies. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2024;22(1):137-153. PMID: 38171719.
  16. Werfel T, et al. S3 Guideline atopic dermatitis Part 2 — Systemic treatment. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2024;22(2):307-320. PMID: 38161245.
  17. Wollenberg A, Barbarot S, Bieber T, et al. ETFAD/EADV Eczema task force 2020 position paper. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(12):2717-2744. PMID: 33205485.
  18. Taiwanese Dermatological Association. Consensus for the management of atopic dermatitis: 2020 update.
  19. Comorbidity and systemic impact
  20. Drucker AM, Wang AR, Li WQ, et al. The burden of atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137(1):26-30.
  21. Schonmann Y, Mansfield KE, Hayes JF, et al. Atopic eczema in adulthood and risk of depression and anxiety. Br J Dermatol. 2020;182(1):82-90.
  22. Patel KR, Immaneni S, Singam V, et al. Association between atopic dermatitis, depression, and suicidal ideation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(2):402-410.
  23. Silverberg JI. Association between adult atopic dermatitis, cardiovascular disease, and increased heart attacks. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135(3):721-728.
  24. Andersen YMF, Egeberg A, Gislason GH, et al. Atopic dermatitis and risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. Br J Dermatol. 2018;178(2):e41-e42.
  25. Hill DA, Spergel JM. The atopic march: critical evidence and clinical relevance. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018;120(2):131-137 (review of Hill 2014 et seq.).
  26. Paller AS, Spergel JM, Mina-Osorio P, et al. The atopic march and atopic multimorbidity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;143(1):46-55.
  27. Du Toit G, Roberts G, Sayre PH, et al. Randomized trial of peanut consumption in infants at risk for peanut allergy (LEAP). N Engl J Med. 2015;372(9):803-813.
  28. Systemic therapy (pivotal trials)
  29. Simpson EL, Bieber T, Guttman-Yassky E, et al. Two phase 3 trials of dupilumab versus placebo (SOLO 1 / SOLO 2). N Engl J Med. 2016;375(24):2335-2348.
  30. Beck LA, Thaçi D, Hamilton JD, et al. Dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(2):130-139. PMID: 25006719.
  31. Paller AS, Simpson EL, Siegfried EC, et al. Dupilumab in children aged 6 months to younger than 6 years with uncontrolled atopic dermatitis. Lancet. 2022;400(10356):908-919.
  32. Wollenberg A, Blauvelt A, Guttman-Yassky E, et al. Tralokinumab for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (ECZTRA 1 and 2). Br J Dermatol. 2021;184(3):437-449.
  33. Silverberg JI, Guttman-Yassky E, Thaçi D, et al. Lebrikizumab for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (ADvocate 1 / 2). N Engl J Med. 2023;388(12):1080-1091.
  34. Kabashima K, Matsumura T, Komazaki H, et al. Nemolizumab plus topical agents in patients with atopic dermatitis and pruritus (ARCADIA). Lancet. 2024;404(10468):1571-1582.
  35. Guttman-Yassky E, Teixeira HD, Simpson EL, et al. Upadacitinib in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (Measure Up 1 / 2). Lancet. 2021;397(10290):2151-2168.
  36. Bieber T, Simpson EL, Silverberg JI, et al. Abrocitinib versus placebo or dupilumab for atopic dermatitis (JADE COMPARE). N Engl J Med. 2021;384(12):1101-1112.
  37. Simpson EL, Lacour JP, Spelman L, et al. Baricitinib in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (BREEZE-AD). Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(2):242-255.
  38. Ytterberg SR, Bhatt DL, Mikuls TR, et al. Cardiovascular and cancer risk with tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis (ORAL Surveillance). N Engl J Med. 2022;386(4):316-326.
  39. Hajar T, Leshem YA, Hanifin JM, et al. A systematic review of topical corticosteroid withdrawal ("steroid addiction"). J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72(3):541-549. PMID: 25592622.
  40. Wollenberg A, Reitamo S, Atzori F, et al. Proactive treatment of atopic dermatitis with twice-weekly tacrolimus ointment. Allergy. 2008;63(7):742-750.